{'It’s like they’ve erupted out of someone’s subconscious': the way horror has taken over modern cinemas.
The largest shock the cinema world has encountered in 2025? The comeback of horror as a leading genre at the UK box office.
As a category, it has notably surpassed earlier periods with a annual growth of 22% for the UK and Irish box office: over £83 million this year, versus £68 million the previous year.
“In the past year, not a single horror movie hit £10 million in UK or Irish theaters. Now, five have achieved that,” notes a box office editor.
The big hits of the year – Weapons (£11.4m), Sinners (£16.2m), The Conjuring Last Rites (£14.98m) and the sequel to a classic (£15.54m) – have all stayed in the multiplexes and in the popular awareness.
Even though much of the professional discussion focuses on the unique excellence of prominent auteurs, their successes indicate something changing between viewers and the style.
“I’ve heard people say, ‘Even if you don’t like horror this is a film you need to see,’” explains a content buying lead.
“Such movies experiment with style and format to produce entirely fresh content, connecting with viewers on a new level.”
But outside of aesthetic quality, the steady demand of spooky films this year suggests they are giving audiences something that’s much needed: emotional release.
“These days, movies echo the prevalent emotions of rage, anxiety, and polarization,” observes a film commentator.
“Scary movies excel at tapping into viewers' fears, amplifying them, allowing you to set aside daily worries and concentrate on the on-screen terror,” explains a prominent scholar of vampire and monster cinema.
In the context of a global headlines featuring war, border tensions, far-right movements, and environmental crises, supernatural beings and undead creatures strike a unique chord with audiences.
“Some research suggests vampire film popularity correlates with financial downturns,” comments an actress from a recent horror hit.
“The concept reflects how economic systems can drain vitality from individuals.”
Since the early days of cinema, social unrest has influenced the genre.
Analysts reference the surge of European artistic movements after the first world war and the turbulent times of the early Weimar Republic, with films such as The Cabinet of Dr Caligari and Nosferatu: A Symphony of Horror.
This was followed by the economic crisis of the 30s and Universal Studios’ Frankenstein and The Wolfman.
“Consider the Dracula narrative: an outsider from the east brings a corrupting influence that permeates society and challenges its heroes,” says a academic.
“So it reflects a lot of anxieties around immigration.”
The phantom of immigration influenced the newly launched folk horror a recent film title.
The filmmaker elaborates: “I wanted to explore ideas around the rise of populism. Firstly, slogans like ‘Let’s Make Britain Great Again’, that harken back to some fantasy time when things were ‘better’, but only if you were a rich white man.”
“Also, the concept of familiar individuals revealing surprising prejudices in casual settings.”
Perhaps, the current era of acclaimed, socially switched-on horror commenced with a brilliant satire released a year after a polarizing administration.
It sparked a recent surge of horror auteurs, including various prominent figures.
“That period was incredibly stimulating,” comments a filmmaker whose film about a deadly unborn child was one of the era’s tentpole movies.
“In my view, it marked the start of a phase where filmmakers embraced wildly creative horror with artistic ambitions.”
The same filmmaker, who is writing a new horror original, adds: “In the last ten years, public taste has evolved to welcome bolder horror concepts.”
Concurrently, there has been a revival of the genre’s less celebrated output.
Recently, a nicke l venue opened in London, showing obscure movies such as a quirky horror title, The Fall of the House of Usher and the modern reinterpretation of Dr Caligari.
The re-appreciation of this “gritty and loud” genre is, according to the theater owner, a clear response to the algorithmic content pumped out at the cinemas.
“It’s a reaction to the sanitised product that’s coming out of Hollywood. You have a film scene that’s more tepid and more predictable. A lot of the mainstream films are very similar,” he says.
“On the other hand, [these indie works] feel imperfect. They seem to burst forth from deep creativity, free from commercial constraints.”
Fright flicks continue to challenge the norm.
“They have this strange ability to seem old fashioned and up to the minute, both at the same time,” notes an expert.
Besides the return of the insane researcher motif – with multiple versions of a classic novel on the horizon – he predicts we will see fright features in the coming years addressing our current anxieties: about tech supremacy in the years ahead and “vampires living in the Trump tower”.
Meanwhile, a biblical fright story The Carpenter’s Son – which depicts the events of holy family challenges after the nativity, and includes famous performers as the holy parents – is scheduled to debut in the coming months, and will definitely send a ripple through the religious conservatives in the US.</