🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat state that indecision over how to tackle the problem is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue details a range of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer locations. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Further up the coast is situated the grave of a former paratrooper killed while working abroad. His parent expressed she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

The lack of consensus over when and how to handle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some are calling for additional coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to continue for now. Others argue the time for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that process with residents.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, providing a spiritual perspective on the physical loss of sacred ground.